Archaeology / Cultural Heritage / History

[Archaeology] [twocolumns]

Anthropology / Human Evolution / Linguistics

[Anthropology] [twocolumns]

Palaeontology / Palaeoclimate / Earth Sciences

[Palaeontology] [twocolumns]

Evolution / Genetics / Biology

[Evolution][twocolumns]

Modern humans did not enter Europe by sea


Ana Mateos and Jesús Rodríguez, scientists at the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), are part of an international team that has published a study in the journal PALAEO3 showing that the first Homo sapiens could not have reached Europe over the Gibraltar or Sicily straits, but they might have got to Eurasia by crossing the Bab-al-Mandab Strait.


Modern humans did not enter Europe by sea
Gibraltar, Sicily and Bab-al-Mandab are the three possible sea routes to Eurasia
[Credit: J Rodríguez]

There exists a long-running scientific debate about the routes taken by the first modern humans to leave Africa. The majority of specialists think they arrived in Europe over a land route through the Levant Corridor. Nevertheless, the idea that they might have entered by crossing the Gibraltar or Sicily straits remains alive in the debate. Another possible entrance route into Eurasia would be over the Red Sea, by crossing the Bab-al-Mandab Strait.




The paper’s authors have used their computational model HomininWaterCrossingABM, which simulates human dispersion over the sea, to analyze the likelihood of crossing a strait using different strategies. The model incorporates reconstructions of the palaeogeography, sea level and currents and water temperature.


The results show that humans could not have crossed the two Mediterranean straits either by passive drifting or active swimming; modern humans could only have done this by raft, but there is no evidence that this technology was within their grasp. On the other hand, the simulations suggest that these humans could have crossed the Bab-al-Mandab Strait by swimming, or even letting the current carry them.


Different climatic scenarios


The effect of the climatic differences between the present day and when the exit from Africa took place, in the Late Pleistocene, was also included in the study. “We ran our simulations in two different climatic scenarios: one representing a warmer period than today and the other a glacial period. These are two extremes enabling us to appraise the effect of the climate on the chances for success in crossing the straits”, explains Rodríguez.




The simulation also takes into account the effect of the principal physiological risks which a human trying to cross a strait face, namely dehydration, hypothermia and exhaustion. “We have seen that in the Mediterranean the greatest risk factors are dehydration and, even more so, hypothermia. However, in the Red Sea, where the water is warmer, these factors exert little influence and death would have taken place from exhaustion”, adds Mateos.


Apart from the CENIEH, the other participants in this paper, whose lead author is Ericson Hölzchen, are scientists from Goethe University in Frankfurt, the Trier Lab for Social Simulation (TRILABS), the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), the Institute of Geography – University of Cologne and the Institut Teknologi Bandung of Indonesia.


Source: CENIEH [February 11, 2022]



Support The Archaeology News Network with a small donation!




TANN

Post A Comment
  • Blogger Comment using Blogger
  • Facebook Comment using Facebook
  • Disqus Comment using Disqus

1 comment :

  1. Thanks for this.
    Yes, late-Pleistocene H.sapiens was not very aquatic any more:
    apparently we had reduced the littoral adaptations of early-Pleistocene H.erectus.
    H.erectus OTOH were slow + shallow divers for shellfish etc., e.g. they had
    - brain size x 2 (cf. Cetacea & Sirenia: brain-specific nutrients in seafood, e.g. DHA),
    - stone tool use (cf. sea-otter), initially for opening shellfish,
    - pachy-osteo-sclerosis: extremely heavy bones, uniquely seen in shallow-diving tetrapods,
    - platycephaly, platypelloidy & platymeria: long flat skull, very broad pelvis with faring ilia, dorso-ventrally flattened femora - typical of marine mammals,
    - projecting mid-faces, google "Oi, big nose! New Scientist",
    - intercontinental dispersal, incl. islands e.g. Flores,
    - fossilization in coasts, e.g. in Trinil on Java 1.8 mill.yrs ago,
    - shell engravings in Trinil, google "Joordens, Munro"
    - etc.
    IOW, H.erectus hadn't needed rafting, but "extant human running is a secondary & conspicuously imperfect adaptation, which evolved late in the human past, e.g. we run maximally 32 km/hr over short, 20 km/hr over long distances, half as fast as typical open plain mammals ... It is often stated that human locomotion was an adaptation to running on the open plains, cf. expressions such as ‘Savannahstan’, ‘endurance running’, ‘born to run’, ‘le singe coureur’ ... Verhaegen cs (2007) disproved in detail all endurance running arguments that our Homo ancestors during most of the Pleistocene were adapted to running over open plains ..."

    ReplyDelete


Exhibitions / Travel

[Exhibitions] [bsummary]

Natural Heritage / Environment / Wildlife

[Natural Heritage] [list]

Astronomy / Astrobiology / Space Exploration

[Universe] [list]