Archaeology / Cultural Heritage / History

[Archaeology] [twocolumns]

Anthropology / Human Evolution / Linguistics

[Anthropology] [twocolumns]

Palaeontology / Palaeoclimate / Earth Sciences

[Palaeontology] [twocolumns]

Evolution / Genetics / Biology

[Evolution][twocolumns]

The temporal lobes of Homo erectus were proportionally smaller than in H. sapiens


Emiliano Bruner, a paleoneurologist at the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), has participated in a study published in the journal Quaternary International, on the anatomy of the temporal lobes in the brain of Homo erectus, which establishes that they were proportionally smaller than in modern humans.

The temporal lobes of Homo erectus were proportionally smaller than in H. sapiens
Credit: Pearson et al. 2020



In H. sapiens, the temporal lobes are relatively more highly developed than in other primates, although little is known about their anatomy in extinct human species, because they are housed in a very delicate region of the cranium known as the middle cranial fossa, which is often not conserved in fossil individuals.

An earlier study by the same team had shown that the size of the middle cranial fossa can be used to deduce the volume of the temporal lobes. In this new study, three anatomical diameters were analyzed in fossils of H. erectus and H. ergaster, and compared with the corresponding measurements for 51 modern humans. The results suggest that both fossil species had temporal lobes proportionally smaller than in humans today.



Moreover, "the Asiatic individuals, namely Homo erectus, had larger temporal lobes than in the African ones, Homo ergaster, although the scanty fossil record does not allow us to tell whether this is due to chance or a paleoneurological difference between the two species," says Bruner.

As the temporal lobe is a brain region involved in the integration of many cognitive functions, such as memory, the emotions, hearing, social relations and language, any change in their sizes or proportions is of transcendent importance, as this could reveal variations in the development of their neurons or their connections, and therefore in the cognitive functions associated to this region of the cerebral cortex.

Source: CENIEH [September 08, 2020]

TANN

Post A Comment
  • Blogger Comment using Blogger
  • Facebook Comment using Facebook
  • Disqus Comment using Disqus

1 comment :

  1. Yhanks for this very interting article. It's not unexpected: probably this only concerns the external skull form, and most likely it does not concern the internal brain organization (temporal lobe evolution), see e.g. the drastic cultural deformations of children's skulls in "primitive" tribes of Papua New Guinea & elswhere.
    The flatter & longer skulls in Javanese H.erectus (platycephaly) support the littoral dispersal hypothesis of archaic Homo: it's becoming more & more clear that Pleistocene "archaic" Homo on their intercontinental journey typically followed the sea-coasts, where they waded & dived for shallow-aquatic foods, probably mostly shellfish (cf stone tool use) which are very rich in brain-specific nutrients such as docosahexaenoic acid, google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo PPT 2020" & the references therein.

    ReplyDelete


Exhibitions / Travel

[Exhibitions] [bsummary]

Natural Heritage / Environment / Wildlife

[Natural Heritage] [list]

Astronomy / Astrobiology / Space Exploration

[Universe] [list]