Archaeology / Cultural Heritage / History

[Archaeology] [twocolumns]

Anthropology / Human Evolution / Linguistics

[Anthropology] [twocolumns]

Palaeontology / Palaeoclimate / Earth Sciences

[Palaeontology] [twocolumns]

Evolution / Genetics / Biology

[Evolution][twocolumns]

Primate voice boxes are evolving at rapid pace


Scientists have discovered that the larynx, or voice box, of primates is significantly larger relative to body size, has greater variation, and is under faster rates of evolution than in other mammals.

Primate voice boxes are evolving at rapid pace
3D image of a gorilla larynx [Credit: Dr Jacob Dunn,
Anglia Ruskin University (ARU)]
Published in the journal PLOS Biology and led by academics from Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Stanford University, and the University of Vienna, the research is the first large-scale study into the evolution of the larynx.



The larynx has three main functions: protecting the airway during feeding, regulating the supply of air to the lungs, and vocal communication. Because of its important role in facilitating social behaviour, through vocalisation, it has long been believed that the larynx is a key area of evolution, particularly in species with highly developed vocal communication systems.

The researchers made CT-scans of specimens from 55 different species, and produced 3D computer models of their larynges. These were studied alongside detailed measurements, including body length and body mass.

Primate voice boxes are evolving at rapid pace
Gorilla skull and larynx [Credit: Dr Jacob Dunn,
Anglia Ruskin University (ARU)]
The primates ranged in size from a pygmy marmoset (Cebuella pygmaea) weighing just 110g, to a Western gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) weighing approximately 120kg. The carnivorans spanned from a 280g common dwarf mongoose (Helogale parvula) to a 180kg tiger (Panthera tigris).

The study found that, for a given body length, primate larynges are on average 38% larger than those of carnivorans, and that the rate of larynx evolution is faster in these species.



There is also more variation in larynx size relative to body size among primates, indicating that primates have greater flexibility to evolve in different ways. Carnivorans follow more of a fixed larynx-size to body-size ratio.

Larynx size was also found to be a good predictor of the call frequency of a species, which demonstrates the relevance for vocal communication of the observed size variations.

Video of a gorilla skull and larynx [Credit: Dr Jacob Dunn, 
Anglia Ruskin University (ARU)]

Co-lead author Dr Jacob Dunn, Reader in Evolutionary Biology at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), said: "This study demonstrates clear differences in the evolution of the larynx between groups of mammals. Specifically, we have shown for the first time that the primate larynx is larger, less closely linked to body size, and under faster rates of evolution than the carnivoran larynx, which is a well-matched comparison group, indicating fundamental differences in the evolution of the vocal organ across species."

Co-lead author Dr Daniel Bowling, Instructor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, added: "Our study also shows that differences in larynx size predict changes in voice pitch, highlighting the larynx's crucial role in vocal communication. This is demonstrated by the rich and varied calls produced by many primate species. The results imply fundamental differences between primates and carnivorans in the forces constraining larynx size, as well as highlighting an evolutionary flexibility in primates that may help explain why they have developed complex and diverse uses of the vocal organ for communication. This provides an exciting avenue for future studies examining variation among other mammalian groups."

Source: Anglia Ruskin University [August 11, 2020]

TANN

Post A Comment
  • Blogger Comment using Blogger
  • Facebook Comment using Facebook
  • Disqus Comment using Disqus

1 comment :

  1. Thanks, very interesting. It confirms that primates (mostly arboreal) are generally noisy creatures. Amid the leaves, vision is poorer, and in the 3D world of the trees, scents more rapidly disappear, no wonder primates often have rely more on sounds. Why didn't the study include the human larynx? Larynx size is only 1 of the elements of human speech. Humans (as opposed to other primates & most mammals except aquatic mammals?) have voluntary control of breathing (breath-hold capacity). We also have vocal learning: human children learn to imitate the sounds produced by their parents & group members, cf parrots etc., see the studies of Irene Pepperberg. All hominoids (apes+humans) show laryngeal descent vs the hyoid, possibly an adaptation for louder & more varied sound productions, cf duetting in less apes (gibbons, siamang), but only Homo (as opposed to apes & australopiths?) shows also hyoidal descent vs the palate (studies of Takeshi Nishimura cs), possibly an adaptation for swallowing soft & slippery foods such as seafoods: early-Pleistocene H.erectus was no endurance runner after antelopes as still sometimes believed, but simply followed the African & Indian Ocean shores: they even colonized islands such as Flores, Sulawesi, Luzon, Crete, Cyprus, Dodekanesos etc. See our paper Vaneechoutte cs 2011 "Seafood, diving, song and speech" p.181-9 in Vaneechoutte cs eds 2011 "Was Man More Aquatic in the Past? Fifty Years after Alister Hardy" eBook Bentham Sci.Publ., or for an update, google "Speech and language originS 2018 verhaegen" & "Lucy was no human ancestor 2020 verhaegen".

    ReplyDelete


Exhibitions / Travel

[Exhibitions] [bsummary]

Natural Heritage / Environment / Wildlife

[Natural Heritage] [list]

Astronomy / Astrobiology / Space Exploration

[Universe] [list]