Daily grind: The biography of a stone axe
Tom Breukel analysed some 250 stone axes from the Caribbean and reconstructed their biographies, thus increasing our knowledge of production and trade in the period around the arrival of Columbus. His Ph.D. defence is on 18 April.
![]() |
| Credit: Tom Breukel |
Breukel studied the axes and discovered that many were only partly finished before they were transported. He found unusual semi-finished products among the traded goods. "The buyers probably wanted to finish the stone axes themselves," he says. "This may have helped them develop a close relationship with the object. Even today, the users in some indigenous communities in the Amazon have a personal relationship with an object, and that's not as easy if you order a ready-made axe."
![]() |
| Credit: Tom Breukel |
Breukel made his discoveries under a microscope. He studied the 250 stone axes by looking, one millimetre at a time, for wear traces and information about the type of stone and production method. This resulted in a biography for each individual object. "Each time the object is usedm traces are left behind that archaeologists can find later, even on a cup as you stir your tea," he says as he holds a greenish axe. "You can read from the grooves in the stone or the residue left behind whether the tool has been used to grind, polish or hack."
![]() |
| Credit: Tom Breukel |
Author: Merijn Van Nuland | Source: Leiden University [April 18, 2019]



or one piece of stone can be first hammer then axe and then knife, during it's life time. Is widely known that if objects were not buried whit owner they recycled, no material to waste. It means more work if you throw away when something is unsuitable. like scientist do by them selves, amounts of trash and bullshit studies. would be possible that archologist would not interpret their foundings by them selves at all, just do technical work. DIG and make test, that would be more economical.
ReplyDelete