Archaeology / Cultural Heritage / History

[Archaeology] [twocolumns]

Anthropology / Human Evolution / Linguistics

[Anthropology] [twocolumns]

Palaeontology / Palaeoclimate / Earth Sciences

[Palaeontology] [twocolumns]

Evolution / Genetics / Biology


Homo naledi had wear-resistant molars

Homo naledi's relatively taller and more wear resistant molars enabled it to have a much more abrasive diet than other South African hominins. This is the result of a recent study published in the Journal of Human Evolution by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, the University of Durham in the United Kingdom and the University of Arkansas in the United States. The researchers conclude that Homo naledi may have eaten a much grittier diet than other South African hominins.

Homo naledi had wear-resistant molars
Molar wear resistance of two older South African hominins (Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus) and
Homo naledi: Darker colours indicate more wear resistant areas of the tooth, and lighter colours indicate less wear
resistant areas [Credit: MPI f. Evolutionary Anthropology]
Mammals that eat foods that need to be cut, like leaves and grasses, have sharper, more complex molars (i.e. more cusps and crests) , while mammals that eat foods that need to be crushed, like fruits and nuts, have duller, less complex molars. The researchers used a technique known as dental topography to measure molar sharpness, complexity, and other aspects of tooth shape in South African hominins to reconstruct the diet of Homo naledi.

The researchers found no difference in sharpness or complexity between the molars of Homo naledi and other South African hominins, implying they ate foods with similar mechanical properties. However, Homo naledi did have relatively taller, more wear resistant molars than other South African hominins, suggesting its teeth were adapted to consume foods that wore its teeth faster. "We think that Homo naledi must have been eating foods covered in dust or grit, or possibly ate plants containing lots of defensive silica particles, known as phytoliths," said Michael Berthaume of the Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology and Durham University, one of the authors of the study.

Protection from gritty diets

Plants produce phytoliths or 'plant stones' to try and prevent animals from eating too much of them. Animals such as grass-eating antelopes living in dry, and hence gritty, environments have high crowned molars to enable them to eat diets heavy in plant stones and grit without wearing their teeth away too much.

The findings of the present study suggest that Homo naledi may have evolved a similar strategy, and hence was eating a different diet to that of other South African hominins. "This lends support to the idea that Homo naledi, with its mixture of traits from earlier and later hominins, was ecologically distinct to other South African hominins," Berthaume added.

Source: Max Planck Society [March 07, 2018]


Post A Comment
  • Blogger Comment using Blogger
  • Facebook Comment using Facebook
  • Disqus Comment using Disqus

1 comment :

  1. Michael Berthaume said "naledi must have been eating foods covered in dust or grit, or plants containing lots of defensive silica particles."
    Very likely it was the latter.
    The Naledi fossils are found in unconsolidated mudstone (wetland), they had curved fingerbones (vertical climbing), plantigrade feet (unlike ostriches, more like wading or swimming birds), chimp-sized brains etc. Comparative biology suggests they often moved like bonobos & lowland gorillas wading bipedally in forest swamps, collecting papyrus sedges, frogbite, waterlilies etc., google
    -"bonobo wading",
    -"gorilla bai".
    IMO it's time we get rid of the anthropocentric fantasies about naledi: they were no closer relatives of us than of bonobos, didn't run over the plains, didn't bury their dead, didn't make tools more than chimps do. Google e.g.
    -"Homo or pan naledi? 2017 Verhaegen"
    -"Ape and Human Evolution 2018 biology vs anthropocentrism".


Exhibitions / Travel

[Exhibitions] [bsummary]

Natural Heritage / Environment / Wildlife

[Natural Heritage] [list]

Astronomy / Astrobiology / Space Exploration

[Universe] [list]