Archaeology / Cultural Heritage

[Archaeology] [twocolumns]

Anthropology / Human Evolution

[Anthropology] [twocolumns]

Palaeontology / Earth Sciences

[Palaeontology] [twocolumns]

Evolution / Genetics

[Evolution][twocolumns]

Big data shows how what we buy affects endangered species


The things we consume, from iPhones to cars to IKEA furniture, have costs that go well beyond their purchase price. What if the soybeans used to make that tofu you ate last night were grown in fields that were hewn out of tropical rainforests? Or if that tee-shirt you bought came from an industrial area that had been carved out of high-value habitat in Malaysia?

Big data shows how what we buy affects endangered species
This map shows the species threat hotspots caused by US consumption. The darker the color, the greater the threat caused 
by the consumption. The magenta color represents terrestrial species, while the blue represents marine species 
[Credit: Daniel Moran and Keiichiro Kanemoto]
Unless you buy sustainably sourced food or goods, however, it can be hard to know just how consumer purchases affect species -- until now. Daniel Moran from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and his colleague Keiichiro Kanemoto from Shinshu University in Japan have developed a technique that allows them to identify threats to wildlife caused by the global supply chains that fuel our consumption. They've used this technique to create a series of world maps that show the species threat hotspots across the globe for individual countries.

6803 species considered

The researchers calculated the percentage of threat to a species in one country due to consumption of goods in another, with a focus on 6,803 species of vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered marine and terrestrial animals as defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and BirdLife International.

One way to see how the hotspot maps work is to look at the effects of US consumption across the globe.

For terrestrial species, the researchers found that US consumption caused species threat hotspots in Southeast Asia and Madagascar, but also in southern Europe, the Sahel, the east and west coasts of southern Mexico, throughout Central America and Central Asia and into southern Canada. Perhaps one of the biggest surprises was that US consumption also caused species threat hotspots in southern Spain and Portugal.

Connecting environmental problems to economic activity

Moran says making the connection between consumption and environmental impacts offers an important opportunity for governments, companies, and individuals to take an informed look at these impacts -- so they can find ways to counteract them.

"Connecting observations of environmental problems to economic activity, that is the innovation here," he said. "Once you connect the environmental impact to a supply chain, then many people along the supply chain, not only producers, can participate in cleaning up that supply chain."

As an example, he said, government regulators can only control the producers whose products cause biodiversity losses and deforestation in Indonesia.

But if the EU wanted to look at its role in causing those problems in Indonesia, they could look at the maps produced by the researchers and see what kind of impacts EU consumers are having on that country, and where those impacts are located -- the hotspots."

The EU "could decide to adjust their research programmes or environmental priorities to focus on certain hotspots in Southeast Asia," Moran said. "Companies could also use these maps to find out where their environmental impact hotspots are, and make changes."

The article describing this effort has been published online in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Source: Norwegian University of Science and Technology [January 04, 2017]
TANN

Post A Comment
  • Blogger Comment using Blogger
  • Facebook Comment using Facebook
  • Disqus Comment using Disqus

1 comment :

  1. Trapping Beaver for hats in Europe had a disastrous effect on America. From 1824 to 1860 more than 3 million beaver were trapped. The first recorded floods of the Mississippi River and the Snake River came around 1860 when the old dams let go. One beaver dam could contain 1 or 2 acre feet of water entrapment. Hidden were seven to fourteen more acre feet of water which seeped into the substructure and watered trees, grasses, berries etc. Deer, elk, buffalo, Indians and white men a thousand miles away were stabilized. It is hard to calculate the millions of acre feet of water that is today wasted and my Congressman from Idaho was so informed. To date nothing has been done, even on Bureau of Land Management and National Parks property. Rivers that ran until late August stop now in June in places like CO, OK, TX, KN, NB. The sand hill crane dies because there isn't sufficient water to wash the large amount of bird poop away when they land in the rivers in large numbers. Put this in the paper and all the Bow Hunters and gun nuts call you every name in the book. Those frontiersmen couldn't have caused all that damage. Fish loss, bird loss, animal loss, habitat loss, it goes on and on.

    ReplyDelete


Exhibitions / Travel

[Exhibitions] [bsummary]

Natural Heritage / Environment / Wildlife

[Natural Heritage] [list]

Astronomy / Astrobiology / Space Exploration

[Universe] [list]