Archaeology / Cultural Heritage / History

[Archaeology] [twocolumns]

Anthropology / Human Evolution / Linguistics

[Anthropology] [twocolumns]

Palaeontology / Palaeoclimate / Earth Sciences

[Palaeontology] [twocolumns]

Evolution / Genetics / Biology


Fossil bee nests provide clues about the environment in which Australopithecus africanus lived

Analysis of the first fossil bee nest from the Plio-Pleistocene of South Africa suggests that the human ancestor Australopithecus africanus lived in a dry savannah environment, according a study published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Jennifer Parker from University College London, United Kingdom, and colleagues.

Fossil bee nests provide clues about the environment in which Australopithecus africanus lived
Photographs of each of the Individual Pieces of Extracted Nest [CreditJennifer F. Parker et al./PLOS ONE (2016)]
Little paleoecological information is available for the site in South Africa where the first Au. africanus fossil—the 'Taung Child'—was discovered. However, insect-related fossils, abundant at the discovery site, can yield insights into the paleoenvironment. Bees, for example, tend to build characteristic nests in characteristic conditions. Parker and colleagues analyzed CT scans of a fossil bee nest that was discovered near the Taung Child site to determine its internal structure and thus the kinds of bees that built it.

Fossil bee nests provide clues about the environment in which Australopithecus africanus lived
Locality and stratigraphy of the deposits [Credit: Jennifer F. Parker et al./PLOS ONE (2016)]
The fossil nest was exceptionally well preserved, and the structure of its cells and tunnels suggested that it was made by a ground-nesting solitary bee. These bees typically nest on bare, light, dry soil that is exposed to the sun, which bolsters other recent evidence that Au. africanus lived in dry savannahs. Insect-related fossils are common but largely overlooked at sites where human ancestors lived, the researchers said, and their work underscores the contribution such fossils can make to understanding the environments where human ancestors lived.

Fossil bee nests provide clues about the environment in which Australopithecus africanus lived
Three different individual cells. (A) and (B) have been extracted from the nest, and (C) (although broken 
in half laterally) remains in the matrix [Credit: Jennifer F. Parker et al./PLOS ONE (2016)]
"When Raymond Dart published his description of the 'Taung Child' in 1925 he profoundly changed our understanding of human evolution," says study co-author Philip Hopley. "In the 90 years following his discovery, attention of anthropologists has moved to other African sites and specimens, and research at Taung has been hampered by the complex geology and uncertain dating. New research at Taung is helping to reconstruct the environment in which this enigmatic little hominin lived and died."

Source: Public Library of Science [September 29, 2016]

Post A Comment
  • Blogger Comment using Blogger
  • Facebook Comment using Facebook
  • Disqus Comment using Disqus

1 comment :

  1. 1) Au.africanus was no human ancestor to the exclusion of Pan & Gorilla. If all australopiths were human ancestors or even relatives but not of the 5 other hominid species (chimps, bonobo, low- & highland gorilla), 1 species (H.sapiens) had 100s or even 1000s of fossils, where the other 5 species had virtually no fossils. This is statistically impossible (= an example of pre-darwininan anthropocentrism): the Asian great ape Pongo does have several fossil ancestors or relatives: Siwa-, Lufeng-, Giganto- & other -pithecus. The humanlike feature of australopiths (e.g. flat feet, vertical posture) are not uniquely-human or derived-human, but are primitive-hominid, e.g. prenatal Pan & Gorilla have flat humanlike feet, which near birth become hand-like; and most if not all fossil hominoids had more vertical spines (gibbons still do).
    2) That there might have been "dry savanna" bees nearby does not contradict that virtually all australopith fossils lay in well-wooded & well-watered milieus (e.g. K.Reed 1997 JHE). The curved hand-bones (vertical climbing), flat feet (as in swimming or wading animals) & the vertical spine suggest that australopiths much more than bonobos & lowland gorillas today waded bipedally for wetland foods, e.g. papyrus, sedges, frogbit, waterlilies. Google "bonobo wading" or see my 1994 paper in Hum.Evol.9:121-139 "Australopithecines: ancestors of the African apes?", IOW, A.africanus'lifestyle was not so "enigmatic", google "aquarboreal".


Exhibitions / Travel

[Exhibitions] [bsummary]

Natural Heritage / Environment / Wildlife

[Natural Heritage] [list]

Astronomy / Astrobiology / Space Exploration

[Universe] [list]