Isolated coral reefs far from human activity are not healthier
For the world's coral reefs, the picture keeps getting gloomier. Although it's widely assumed that both local and global factors are contributing to their decline, new research from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill shows that isolated reefs far from human activities are in fact not healthier than those in more densely populated areas.
|Staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) [Credit: Wikipedia]|
"We often mythologize isolated coral reefs as pristine and safe from harm," said Bruno. "In fact, coral loss on some of our isolated reefs is just as dramatic as coral decline on reefs adjacent to more densely populated islands."
Bruno and co-author Abel Valdivia (a former UNC-Chapel Hill graduate student, currently a research scientist for the Center for Biological Diversity in Oakland, Calif.), analyzed data from 1,708 reefs around the world from the Bahamas to Australia collected from 1996 to 2006. Reef isolation was calculated as the number of people living within 50 kilometers of the reefs.
The research, to be reported online July 20 in the Nature journal Scientific Reports, shows that local management efforts to mitigate impacts of things like fishing and tourism cannot alone restore coral reef populations, which provide a home for thousands of marine species and offer coastal buffering from storms.
"Widespread arguments that coral reef degradation is mostly caused by local factors are unsupported," added Valdivia. "We found the problem is better explained by global impacts such as climate change."
One striking example is the massive bleaching of hundreds of kilometers on the northern and central Great Barrier Reef in Australia—which is one of the world's most isolated and well-protected reefs—that was reported earlier this year, Bruno said.
"Our work illustrates the truly far-reaching effects of global warming and the immediate need for drastic and sustained cuts in carbon emissions to help restore the health of coral reefs," Bruno said.
Source: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [July 25, 2016]